Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project, which campaigns against the misuses of biotechnology, said: 'It appears these weapons cross a dangerous line and appear to be tantamount to developing some kind of ethnic weapon. '

This applies to non-terrorist offending. Potential Terrorism Act offences would fall to the Counter Terrorism Division to consider. Response by poster: Thanks for the comments everyone. I must admit I'm not thinking straight at the moment due to the stress of the noise pollution and the worry about the fire hazard etc. It's one of those things that is more satisfying to think about than do. I feel like I'm trapped in my front room and have started dreading leaving work due to the noise. I'm going to tell my neighbour about the plan as he spends time outside during the day too. Though he's smelt the cannabis smoke as well as my friend further down the road. So hopefully he'll understand. The ESA 1883 offences are serious: all carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. If there is sufficient evidence to prosecute, it is likely that a prosecution will be in the public interest. However, the public interest factors in the Code must be considered. Further guidance on relevant considerations can be found in other prosecution guidance, including Mental Health – suspects and defendants and Children as suspects and defendants. When applying section 6 of the Code for Crown Prosecutors, prosecutors may wish to consider the following, in particular when considering which charges reflect the seriousness and extent of the offending, give the court adequate powers to sentence and enables the case to be presented in a clear and simple way.

Alternative offences, set out below, provide for their own definition of what an “explosive” (or other prohibited article) is. Expert evidence The offence under section 2 of the 1883 Act is wider than the Offences Against the Persons Act offences because: Dalton believes that a combination of these two smells released into a crowd would cause panic. She said: 'If these were released, they would clear an area in seconds.'

Expert evidence should only seek to assist with specialist knowledge and information outside the knowledge of the tribunal of fact. Proof of the offence may come, in part, from what non-expert witnesses have observed. Highly exceptionally it may come solely from non-expert witnesses where it is established that an expert cannot assist with specialist knowledge and information and where the non-expert evidence provides sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction. Prosecutors should make clear in such highly exceptional cases the position as to expert evidence in their application for consent, liaising with the AGO as appropriate prior to submission of the application. Consent applications must explain the prosecutor’s position on the question of expert evidence. In threshold test cases, this includes on what basis it is said there are reasonable grounds to suspect the person to be charged has committed the offence alleged, and what further evidence is likely to be available within a reasonable time. This will ordinarily involve providing at least preliminary expert evidence with the application. Lawful object One question she was trying to answer was whether there were different cultural reactions to bad smells. She tested the odours on five ethnic groups.Section 9 of the ESA 1883 provides the definition of “explosive substance”. This includes “any materials for making any explosive substance; also any apparatus, machine, implement, or materials used, or intended to be used, or adapted for causing, or aiding in causing, any explosion in or with any explosive substance; also any part of any such apparatus, machine, or implement.” “Explosive” is not defined in the legislation. When reviewing a case where the defence of lawful object on the basis of personal experimentation, self-education or similar, prosecutors should consider the evidence:

consider ESA 1883 charges or charges contrary to section 28, 29, 30 or 64 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (explosives offending involving grievous bodily harm, caused or intended – or other intent contrary to the Act)They've been told to keep the fire exit doors shut by the letting agent and the environmental health officer. They say they'll keep them shut to these people, then will open the doors and keep them open throughout the day. Having experience of someone else who was like this, I know that sometimes the only way to get them to listen isn't with words but actions. For instance my ex fiance, when he was lodging with me left bread crumbs all over the kitchen, despite me asking him nicely to clean up after himself. He'd say he would but never did. The only time he did start cleaning up after himself was when I put his bread crumbs in his bed.